Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+ | Power vs Precision
An affordable brand’s most premium e-bike against a premium brand’s most affordable one. The intersection point of great bikes at great prices, but which is best for you?
I’m also fairly knowledgeable about my passions and hobbies. I can identify and appreciate the differences between entry-level products, mid-tier ones, and premium ones. I tend to prefer the premium ones (go figure).
Sadly, it’s rare that my budget sees eye-to-eye with my tastes in the products I want. I know it’s a bit of an unrealistic ask, but I want top-tier products at rock-bottom prices. Since waiting on that seems foolish, I instead aim at getting the best of the middle tier with a price closer to the entry-level one.
Happily, that description applies well to two hardtail eMTBS: the Aventon Ramblas and the Trek Marlin+. Both are exceptional rides flush with desirable components and features, with a few standout ones that make the ride feel more premium. Either is great for hitting your local trails, and both work nicely as your one and only e-bike if you want to ride around town, too.
They look similar stacked next to each other, and there is plenty of overlap between them when it comes to their use cases and spec sheets. So… which should you choose?
I’ve extensively tested and reviewed them both, logging over a hundred miles apiece. I like both of them for very different reasons. So, if you’re stuck trying to figure out which one is best for you, keep reading below, and I’ll lay out all their key differences section by section.
*Note, we tested the Marlin+ 8, but there is the Marlin+ 6 as well.
Aventon Ramblas |
Trek Marlin+ |
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Test Results & Key Specs
Aventon Ramblas | Trek Marlin+ | |
Testing Results | ||
Range Test – Maximum PAS | 47.5 miles | 30.7 miles |
Range Test – Minimum PAS | 107.4 miles | 71.12 miles |
Hill Test – Pedal | 1:16, 14.7 mph | 1:48, 10 mph |
Speed Test | No PAS: 9.3 Eco: 13.5 Tour: 15.2 Sport: 20.3 |
No PAS: 11 Eco: 12.8 Tour+: 15.2 Turbo: 19.3 |
Electrical | ||
Motor | Aventon A100: 36V, 250W mid-drive w/750W peak, 100 Nm torque | Bosch Active Line Plus: 36V, 250W mid-drive w/ 600W peak, 50 Nm torque |
Battery | 706 Wh, LG cells | 400 Wh, Bosch CompactTube |
Charger | 42V, 4A charger | 110V, 2A smart system |
Pedal Assist | 3 PAS levels, programmable engagement in Aventon app | 3 PAS levels + Auto mode, programmable engagement in Bosch Flow app |
Display | LCD Smart “Easy Read” | Bosch Purion 200 |
Throttle | N/A | N/A |
Key Components | ||
Frame | 6061 Single-Butted Aluminum Alloy, 4 sizes, 5’1″ – 6’5″ | Alpha Gold Aluminum, 5 sizes |
Brakes | Sram DB8 mineral 4 piston hydraulic disc brakes, 200mm front 180mm rear | Shimano 4-piston hydraulic disc, MT4100 lever, MT420 caliper, 203mm rotors front and rear |
Drivetrain | Sram SX Eagle 34t, 1×12 11-50t | Shimano Deore M6100 32t, 1×12 10-51t |
Shifters (type) | Sram NX Eagle 1×12 single click | Shimano Deore M6100, 12 speed |
Fork | BOREALIS: RockShox 35 Silver R 130mm travel. Coil, 44mm offset, 15×110 QR axle, 1.5″ tapered steerer tube AURORA: Rockshox Psylo Silver R, 35mm Stanchions, coil, 44mm offset, 15x110mm BOOST, 1.5″tapered steerer tube, Rebound adjust | Size: XS RockShox Recon Silver RL, Solo Air, Motion Control damper, lockout, tapered steerer, 46mm offset, Boost110, 15mm Maxle Stealth, 100mm travel Size: S RockShox Recon Silver RL, Solo Air, Motion Control damper, lockout, tapered steerer, 46mm offset, Boost110, 15mm Maxle Stealth, 120mm travel Size: M , L , XL RockShox Recon Silver RL, Solo Air, Motion Control damper, lockout, tapered steerer, 42mm offset, Boost110, 15mm Maxle Stealth, 120mm travel |
Rear Suspension | N/A | N/A |
Tires | S Maxxis Rekon 27.5×2.4″, M/L/XL Maxxis Rekon 29×2.4″ | Size: XS , S Bontrager Gunnison Pro XR, Tubeless Ready, dual compound, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 27.5×2.60” Size: M , L , XL Bontrager Gunnison Pro XR, Tubeless Ready, dual compound, aramid bead, 60 tpi, 29×2.60” |
Handlebar | 35mm, 9° rise, 720mm width for size S, 760mm width for size M-XL | Size: XS , S Bontrager alloy, 31.8mm, 15mm rise, 720mm width Size: M , L , XL Bontrager alloy, 31.8mm, 15mm rise, 750mm width |
Seatpost | 150mm travel for size M-XL. 125mm travel for size S. 31.6mm ø. 395mm length | Size: XS , S TranzX JD-YSP18, 100mm travel, internal routing, 31.6mm, 361mm length Size: M , L , XL TranzX JD-YSP18, 150mm travel, internal routing, 31.6mm, 470mm length |
Grips | Lock on | Bontrager XR Trail Comp, nylon lock-on |
Saddle | Ergonomic | Bontrager |
Kickstand | Included | Sold separately |
Rear Rack | N/A | Sold separately |
Lights | Front included | N/A |
UL Certification | TUV, in accordance with UL 2849 | UL 2849 |
Weight & Dimensions | ||
Weight w/battery | 50.2 lbs (L) | 49.2 lbs (L) |
Battery Weight | 6.7 lbs | N/A |
Maximum Payload | 300 lbs | 300 lbs |
Maximum Load On Racks (if applicable) | N/A |
Aventon Ramblas |
Trek Marlin+ |
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Range and Battery Capacity
Range Test Results:
Aventon Ramblas | Trek Marlin+ | |
Max PAS | 47.5 miles | 30.7 miles |
Min PAS | 107.4 miles | 71.12 miles |
*One quick note: these tests were all done on our local bike paths, not MTB trails. Results will likely be less on MTB trails.
It wasn’t a huge shock to see the bike with the larger battery had better range. But when I put both bikes’ datasets under the microscope, I was happy with what I found.
The Ramblas achieved the 5th longest MIN and MAX tests we’ve ever recorded across 260+ bikes we’ve done this for. With a motor I think of as quick and powerful, I was surprised it didn’t burn through the battery quickly too.
The Marlin+ 8 was impressive in its own right. When looking at which bike is most efficient based on mileage achieved on the battery size it comes with (miles/watt hours), the Marlin had the 8th best MIN result and 14th best MAX result we’ve ever had (15th and 32nd for the Ramblas, respectively).
Why does efficiency matter? Well, the smaller battery gives the Marlin a lower overall weight, which is nice for its handling, but it shows it’s no slouch in range. The Marlin+ is also compatible with the Bosch PowerMore 250, which, based on our results, should add another 19 – 45 miles of riding if you buy that.
So, total range: advantage Ramblas. Better efficiency (and lighter bike as a result): advantage Marlin+ 8.
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Power (Hill Test)
Hill Test Results:
Aventon Ramblas | Trek Marlin+ | |
MAX Pedal | 1:16, 14.7 mph | 1:48, 10 mph |
Similar to the range test, this wasn’t necessarily a surprise either. The motor with more ‘stuff’ had the better climb time.
The Ramblas has 100 Nm of torque which doubles the Marlin’s motor. It also has a higher wattage peak up to 750 vs the Marlin’s 600. That’s what helped it achieve the fastest mid-drive eMTB result we’ve ever tested on our hill, period. The Marlin+ 8, on the other hand, had one of the slower times we’ve had up the hill.
The two bikes’ gearing ratios were similar, so most riders won’t tell the difference. Both bikes have a great range of gears for practical use on most types of trails/terrain.
If raw time/power is all that matters to you, then move on to the next section. If performance/feel/engagement matter to you, well, let’s get into a bit of nuance.
The Ramblas made it feel like I could climb almost anything. It has all the juice to climb up the gnarly, rocky, uneven trails I tested it on. It did occasionally over-boost me in a way that wasn’t as dialed in as I’d hoped for.
The Bosch motor on the Marlin was better at responding to how much power I needed in a given situation. I had to work a bit harder, sure, but the smoothness of the climb was noticeably more refined. Also, working hard is somewhat the point. It’s designed to help, not run the show.
Either motor comes with an app where you can tailor the power and engagement settings more to your liking, but in general, I’d say the Bosch motor is maybe a notch above where the A100 motor is for now on engagement, while the Ramblas wins for sheer power.
Aventon Ramblas |
Trek Marlin+ |
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Brakes (Brake Test)
Instead, we’re sticking to good old-fashioned ‘how does it feel?’ analysis here.
Both bikes have 4-piston hydraulic brakes. The Ramblas has a 200/180mm rotor setup, while the marlin has a pair of 203mm rotors. Both have good responsiveness, modulation and feel.
If you hold my feet to the fire and say to pick which is better, I’d maybe prefer the Ramblas’ DB8, but we’re diving into personal preference territory at that point. The Trek has more heat dissipation too with the larger rear rotor so that might appeal to you.
In either case, if you’re riding on the path, either set is more than equipped for the job. Either one gives great control on mountain trails for handling hardtail-friendly areas. Both feel like good value and come from brand names you can trust when it comes to producing higher-quality products.
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Speed Capabilities (Speed Test)
Aventon Ramblas | Trek Marlin+ | |
PAS 0 | 9.3 | 11 |
Eco | 13.5 | 12.8 |
Tour/Tour+ | 15.2 | 15.2 |
Turbo | 20.3 | 19.3 |
Both rides are class 1 e-bikes, meaning you can max out at 20 mph. You can see the speeds I got when testing their programming, but again, you can change and tailor any of those outputs in the bike’s app. So, let’s talk a little more about the nature of these two motors.
The Ramblas’s A100 is powerful and fast. I did a lot of riding in go-go-go fashion. It was exhilarating, and in Turbo mode it was almost effortless. I had a blast zooming down flowy single track, and I felt the bike moved and manuevered pretty well. It definitely put the ‘e’ in e-bike.
The Marlin+ 8 was more subtle while still providing great speed. Eco and Tour+ riding is the type of thing you can almost forget you’re riding an e-bike on. The speeds increased, but there was almost no discernable noise, and power ramped up in lockstep with your pedal cadence, adding sneaky wattage to what you produced yourself. I knew I wasn’t superpowered like I was on the Ramblas, but it gave me terrific self-power.
Aventon Ramblas |
Trek Marlin+ |
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Components
Many of the components on these two bikes come from different brands, but mostly are from similar rungs on their respective ladders. To me, the tires, brakes and drivetrains are all a push. I think there is one area in particular though that Trek has the upper hand.
The Marlin+8 comes with a RockShox Recon Silver air fork with up to 120mm of travel. Overall, I was impressed with its stiffness and thought it held up nicely, giving me dialed-in control over how I wanted to ride.
The Ramblas’s Rockshox coil fork has 130mm of travel. The Borealis color Ramblas I tested didn’t have compression adjustment of any kind. I weigh 230 lbs, and I have just about the right amount of sag in the fork, but again, no adjustment. Less adaptable = less appealing.
I think the total component package is slightly better on Trek’s side overall, but Aventon isn’t far behind and is the cheaper bike by several hundred dollars. If you’re not a fan of the fork, it’s relatively easy to upgrade.
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Ride Quality
Aventon makes their own frames, and now they’re making motors. I’m generally a fan of vertical integration – the end product often feels better and more put together as a result. The Ramblas is about as good as it gets for anybody on their first attempt.
The Marlin+ 8 on the other hand does display that ‘je ne sais quoi’ that legacy brand’s like Trek have in their favor. Trek’s been at it for decades now, and the bike feels ‘tighter’ overall. The handling component is on display, and the pairing of a motor with near-seamless integration to a rider’s pedal effort works some serious magic.
I know I’ve brought it up already, but the fork on the Marlin was noticeably more comfortable too.
I also like the emphasis they placed on marketing the Marlin+ as being a good e-bike for doing a bit of everything. Hit single track on the weekends, but equip it as a commuter throughout the week. That will encourage more e-bike adoption when you feel you can buy one bike for two types of riding.
Aventon Ramblas vs Trek Marlin+: Which Should You Choose?
I’ll just break it down to the defining characteristics of the bikes instead, and let you choose which one sounds better to you.
The Ramblas has terrific power, and range for days. The spec sheet goes toe-to-toe with the Marlin+ 8 in nearly every respect save for the fork, but you’re spending $600 less so something had to give (and in all likelihood, you can upgrade to a similar or better fork off that savings). It’s got great value for what you’re buying.
The Marlin+ 8 has the dialed-in feel you’d expect from a brand that’s been in this game as long as Trek has (and Bosch too for that matter). It’s a bit more comfortable and adjustable, it has five frames instead of four to pick from for a better fit. Is it more expensive? Yup. But it also means you have an expansive network of Trek mechanics nearby who can help come service time.
Fortunately, I don’t believe there is such a thing as a wrong choice here. If you’ve whittled it down to these two bikes, one way or another, you’ll be riding off on a good one.
*For more info on the Aventon Ramblas, check out its full review here.
*For more info on the Trek Marlin+ 8, check out its full review here.
Aventon Ramblas |
Trek Marlin+ |